That the German Chancellor's visit to Israel is wrong while an indicted war criminal is in office, however it really depends on the message. If the Chancellor didn't go he could be accused of turning a blind eye to Israel's crimes. Of course if he's just there to pat Yeeha's back and visit that wall (like Rubio), that would be wrong, but it does look like he's there to try and talk some sense to the Israeli leadership, which should be encouraged.
However judging by Yeeha's continued rejection of a two state solution, the settler (and Israeli State) violence in the West Bank and the lack of sanctions imposed on this rogue State thanks to America's veto, I am still on the skeptical side of the fence regarding a Palestinian State being realised!
However judging by Yeeha's continued rejection of a two state solution, the settler (and Israeli State) violence in the West Bank and the lack of sanctions imposed on this rogue State thanks to America's veto, I am still on the skeptical side of the fence regarding a Palestinian State being realised!
Last edited: